Pro Life on Campus … the way it oughtta be!
This is how pro-life activism on campus should work. For a few hours every week, pro-life student Anna Maher takes an abortion photo out into the center of campus at George Mason University (GMU). She works with Jonathan Darnel, CBR volunteer and pro-life activist in the DC area. Anna e-mailed me recently:
[We] have started to do Pro-Life outreach every Monday (and now Friday) at GMU, in the center of campus. We usually have a big sign with graphics, or a message, and ask passers-by what they think. Let me tell you…it is moving…truly the best part of my week. Through this outreach I have gained several emails, of mostly GMU students, who are willing to give their support. I e-mail them every week and let them know of outreach at GMU and of the status of Students For Life …
Pray that God uses her to help me open doors; for my resources are quickly running dry. Please, Please PRAY! …
Find some time to relax during this special Christmas season and remember who started this all: the Lord Jesus Christ! Thank you for all you do, and for finding me at GMU last summer. This has all changed my life.
The future of the pro-life movement. Anna is saving babies and moms at GMU, but God is at work in her life as well. I thank Him for young people like Anna. She will play a key part in overturning Roe v Wade.
Pro-life at GMU on the rise! A few days after sending this e-mail, Anna called to say that she had found a new faculty sponsor for GMU Students for Life (SFL). CBR actually started the GMU SFL back in 2003, but the leadership waned and the faculty advisor retired, so there hadn’t been any pro-life activism in a couple of years. Until now. It looks like we are back on track at GMU. This is all part of our strategy to elevate pro-life activism in important swing states like Virginia.
No discrimination against pro-life students is allowed. The faculty sponsor is important because the rules generally mandate that a student group find one as a condition of “recognition” (i.e., equal access to university facilities). However, whether the university administrators realize it or not, the courts would never allow such rules to deny equal access for unpopular groups who simply cannot find a faculty sponsor. Such policies, as written, give university employees (i.e., faculty members) veto power over free speech and equal access. Even Clinton appointees wouldn’t allow that kind of discrmination. And we’ll be happy to prove it in court, if it ever comes to that.
This entry was posted on Wednesday, December 7th, 2011 at 5:00 pm and is filed under Campus Debate (GAP). You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.