Abortion debate, Part 4: Who is more pro-choice?
Continuing the coverage of my debate at Eastern Kentucky University. Part 3 was here.
As you might imagine, Dr. McLean was big on “choice.” I said in my opening remarks that I was as pro-choice than just about anybody in the room. I believe that every woman and every man should be free to choice her own health care provider, her own school, her own religion, her own career, etc.
What I didn’t say (but should have) is that unlike many on the political left, I even believe people should decide whether or not they will join a union and whether or not they will have money taken out of their paychecks to support union-backed political candidates.
But some choices are wrong, even immoral, like killing innocent human beings simply because they are in the way and cannot defend themselves.
She also objected to being called “pro-abortion” instead of “pro-choice.” I admitted that I often use the more pejorative term, but it can certainly be justified. Stephen Douglas was said to be personally opposed to slavery, but he argued that the states should have to “right to choose” whether to be free states or slave states. We always refer to him as “pro-slavery,” not “pro-choice.”
Following our prepared remarks, we took questions. Lots of questions. At the scheduled ending, the moderator asked if we would be willing to stay longer. I asked when the Cracker Barrel closed. We ended up staying for an extra hour.
One student asked how many churches support our “hate-filled message.” His question was laden with additional pejoratives, but I can’t recall his exact words. I had to restrain my laughter, because if the Christian church in America—I’m talking about the self-proclaimed “pro-life” church—had ever taken abortion seriously, this would have been over long ago.
People frequently ask about my religious views, as if abortion were a religious issue. I pointed out that although my religion demands that I care about others, you don’t have to share my Christian beliefs to know killing people is wrong. We’re not asking people to accept a new system of morality; we just want them to apply their own system of morality to all human beings.
More in Part 5
This entry was posted on Thursday, April 21st, 2011 at 9:12 am and is filed under Pro Life. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.