Archive for August, 2012
A new CNN poll finds that 52% of Americans believe abortion should be illegal in all or most circumstaces, whereas 44% want abortion legal in all or most circumstances.
We are all incredulous that ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, and other media organs of the pro-abortion Democrat party can still get by with marginalizing pro-lifers (52% of the American public) as being the “extremists” on abortion. That they can do it with a straight face is beyond belief.
Link to the CNN report here. Pay attention to Questions 10 and 11 on page 13.
Trend line is not good. Note that the nominal pro-life position (abortion illegal in all circumstances or legal in only a few circumstances) has declined from 64% in 2006 to the 52% in the current poll.
One caveat: The pro-life questions were included in a larger poll relating to the coming elections. This could bias the results, but I’m not sure which way.
Some pro-life outlets have presented a bit more rosy picture of this poll, reporting on another question that combined “legal under most circumstances” and “legal in a few circumstances” into a non-descript “legal under certain circumstances” category that boths sides try to claim as their own.
On Monday evening, Knoxvillians gathered at Tyson Park to offer prayers of thanks for the closing of Volunteer Women’s Medical Clinic, an abortion facility that operated on Concord Street for 38 years. The closure (reported here) was attributed to Tennessee’s new law requiring abortion doctors to have hospital privileges.
One down, two to go! The Knoxville Center for Reproductive Health continues to perform mechanical abortions on Clinch Avenue and Planned Parenthood continues to perform chemical abortions on Cherry Street.
Revised: August 28, 2012, 5:00 pm / Updated: August 28 & August 31
“How do you answer the rape question?” We get it all the time. Our answer? “Very carefully.”
Missouri Senate candidate Todd Akin set off a firestorm last week with his answer to the rape question. Of course Obamacrats will demagogue the issue, but I’ve been disappointed by the reaction of some Republicans. Afraid of getting sound-byted themselves, they just want Mr. Akin to go away and take his controversy with him.
I’ve also been disappointed by the media. Of course I expected NBC/CBS/ABC to respond in their normally superficial and partisan way, but not the fair and balanced network. Even there, we got almost no relevant facts, just talking heads reacting out of ignorance. Perhaps research and reason are difficult and boring. Bombasity sells.
There are two attacks on Mr. Akin. The first is about his use of the term “legitimate” rape. The second is about his assertion that a woman who is raped has a very small likelihood of getting pregnant (which he qualified by saying that he had been told this by doctors).
It is clear from the context that Mr. Akin was talking about an actual rape, perhaps as opposed to an accused rape. Of course, the people who screamed for “context” to Mr. Obama’s “You didn’t build that” statement a few weeks ago now want no such context for Mr. Akin. Here’s how everybody is getting this wrong:
President Barack Obama. President Obama said, “The idea that we should be parsing and qualifying and slicing what types of rape we’re talking about doesn’t make sense to the American people, and certainly doesn’t make sense to me.”
Really, Mr. President? So, if we were to talk about alleged rapist Bill Clinton, keynote speaker at the Democratic Convention, we needn’t parse differences between an alleged crime and a real (AKA, “legitimate”) crime, right? Applying your rule, we should simply say that Mr. Clinton is a rapist, right?
For more on Democratic rape hypocrisy, check out this column by Gregory Kane.
Republicans running for cover. Sometimes, people should just stand up and say what’s right … even politicians. I won’t comment whether Mr. Akin should stay in the race or not. I would gladly throw the man under the bus myself (and jump under it with him) to get a decent Senator from Missouri. However, Republicans shouldn’t be so hypocritical … nor hypercritical … regarding an ill-chosen word. They’ve all done it. By piling on Mr. Akin, they are turning a difficult situation into an impossible one. For more about the GOP in panic, see Pat Buchanan’s piece.
I was especially disappointed that Mitt Romney called on Mr. Akin to exit the race. Wasn’t it Mr. Romney who once said, “I don’t care about poor people”? It was clear from the context that he didn’t mean it like it sounded.
What they should say is this: “I am sure Mr. Akin didn’t mean it the way some want to demagoge it. Mr. Akin simply believes that every human life is sacred and should be respected.”
Conception After Rape
I am certain that doctors have told Mr. Akin that a victim of rape is less likely to get pregnant than a woman who engaged in consensual sex. It is an oft-repeated belief, even if it isn’t true. We know some women get pregnant from rape (including CBR’s Virginia Director, by the way). (The ABC Medical Unit blog reported estimates of pregnancy from rape ranging from 10,000 to 30,000 per year.) But here’s how everybody is getting it wrong:
Todd Akin himself. First, he needed to construct his statement based on provable facts and practice his statement, before he was asked the question. Second, he needed to be skeptical of activists, especially those on his own side. He listened to pro-life doctors, but pro-lifers are like everybody else; they repeat what they’ve heard (if it supports their point of view) and they rarely bother to check the facts. In the age of Google, that’s inexcusable. Third, he needs to stay on topic. The percentage of women getting pregnant from rape has nothing to do with the humanity of their children.
Bottom line: He is running for the US Senate. He needs to be more disciplined.
Critics who know nothing about reproductive science (and too little about Google). Lou Dobbs (Fox News) said Mr. Akin’s statement was “absurd” and even invited two psychologists to analyze. Phil Williams, a local radio personality who is nominally conservative, called Mr. Akin a liar for saying that a doctor had told him that rape victims are less likely to conceive.
Not so fast. Dr. Jack Wilke, and OB-GYN and pro-life activist) wrote an article in 1999, Rape Pregnancies are Rare. I don’t have a source, but some have attempted to explain this phenomenon based on stress, which has long been believed that stress can interfere with normal reproductive processes. Certainly rape is stressful. Based on these and other factors, some pro-lifers have believed for many years that a rape victim rarely gets pregnant. I have heard it many times and I’m certain many doctors have repeated it. Readers can judge Dr. Wilke’s analysis of the data themselves and I’m not trying to sell his conclusion; I’m just saying that many credentialed people do believe it and repeat it.
Here’s the science, as nearly as I can Google. The chances of a woman getting pregnant from a single incidence of consensual sex is 3.1% (source). The ABC News blog dutifully reported that some studies have shown that the probability of conception from a single act of rape has been reported as high as 6.4%. What they fail to tell you is that other researchers have reported conception rates among rape victims as low as 1%, which is a despicable omission. In his book Theories of Rape, author Lee Ellis cited one study in which “researchers were able to document only 1 pregnancy out of 232 incidences of rape that could definitely be attributed to the attack” (Theories of Rape, published by Taylor & Francis, 1989, page 47).
I don’t know whether a rape victim is more, equally, or less likely to get pregnant. But this I know: Even if Mr. Akin’s statement is incorrect — I tend to believe it is incorrect — it is certainly not without basis.
Like I said, I don’t know if Mr. Akin should stay in the race or not. If he can’t win, he needs to accept political realities and bow out. Our country and our children are at stake.
I’m not a political expert, but if he stays and fights, I would tell him this:
- Quit apologizing. Enough already.
- Regarding “legitimate” rape, say something like this: “Look, in the course of conversation, I added a word that didn’t need to be there. I understand what they want you to think I said, but everybody knows that I didn’t mean it that way. Rape is a serious crime; and we need to do more to understand it and prevent it.”
- Regarding the science, “Of course I know that women get pregnant from rape. I had been told that it was rare, but now I know it is maybe not as rare as I was told. Deal with it.”
- Answer the rape question this way, “I believe every human life is sacred and should be welcomed and supported by all of us. We can’t solve one act of violence by committing another. By the way, many victims of rape agree with me. So do their living children (example).”
What do you say?
UPDATE – Aug 28, 2012, 10:40 am: More recent over-the-top statements by Karl Rove, Andrew Napolitano, and others have likely delivered the coup de grace to any chances Mr. Akin had left. The Dems will gleefully capture Republican soundbytes denouncing Mr. Akin and play them over and over again. If he wants to make sure the Republicans can win back that seat (so they can pass a budget and stop ObamaCare), he has no choice but to stand aside and let the Republican Establishment send in a relief pitcher. Fair or not, that’s just the political reality.
UPDATE – August 31, 3:25 am: See Ryan Bomberger’s column on Karl Rove’s comments. He is obviously not a friend of the pro-life movement.
We often hear from pro-lifers who question our use of the word “fetus” on our GAP signs, Choice signs, and RCC truth trucks. “Fetus” is the word used by pro-aborts to dehumanize the preborn child, so why would we want to use their word?
First, it is critical to restore meaning to the words that pro-aborts are fond of using, so that when they use their words in public, our side gets the benefit. The other side is quite fond of the word “fetus,” because it conjures up something subhuman in the minds of so many people. They will never agree to use our word, so we must restore meaning to their word. When pro-aborts say the word “fetus,” people who have seen our signs won’t think of a formless lump of cells; they will remember the picture of a human being with arms and legs and fingers and toes. If we restore meaning to the word, the other side can’t use it to confuse people.
Second, we only have a few seconds with people as we pass them with our trucks. When they see the truck, we want them to say something like, “Wow, I didn’t know killing a fetus meant killing a being with arms and legs and fingers and toes.” If we flash the word “child” instead, people might think of infanticide, not abortion. It won’t make sense to them. By using the word that they are most familiar with, we reduce the amount of time necessary to convey the message.
Third, we want to reinforce in people that the word “fetus” is just another stage of life … as in embryo, fetus, infant, toddler, adolescent, teenager, young adult, middle aged adult, senior citizen, geezer, etc.
Fourth, we can’t force them to use our word, so perhaps a form of jujutsu might be more effective. The other side has all the worldly power behind it (the media, the education system, the news media, the entertainment industry, etc.). Jujutsu is a martial art in which one seeks to manipulate the opponent’s force against himself rather than confronting him with one’s own force. We want to take over their words so that when pro-aborts try to use them, it turns to our benefit.
Bottom line: The other side dehumanized the word “fetus;” we are restoring its humanity.
Can we ever use the word, “child?” Yes, of course! Suppose I am talking to a pro-abort who asserts that abortion may be justified based on poverty, personal choice, etc. I would first show him a photo of a 1st-trimester abortion. We have to define that word “abortion.” Then I would trot out the toddler, i.e., ask if it would be OK to kill a 2-year old child for the same reason. That way, I can focus his attention on the real issue, which is not poverty, choice, etc. The real issue is “What is the unborn?”
But later in the conversation, when he goes back to “choice” and “rights,” I might force him back to the main point by saying something like, “A parent does not have a right to kill his own child.” When I use the word “child,” he cannot dispute the statement, so he has to dispute the notion that the fetus is a child. But our signs use the word “fetus” because this word, juxstaposed with the photos, helps us make our case that the fetus is, in fact, a human child.
In this way, I am using the word “child” in conversation to do the same thing that we used the word “fetus” to do on our signs. In both cases, we are refocusing our audience on the key point, “What is the unborn?”
CBR’s Key States Initiative (KSI) was the lead story on WUSA-TV in Washington, DC on Monday night. Virginia Project Director (and truck-driver extraordinaire) Nicole Cooley was interviewed on-camera by news anchor Peggy Fox. It was the lead story on the evening news! Links:
- News Story on WUSA-TV (awesome video)
- Text version (same video)
- WUSA-TV Facebook Page (130+ comments so far)
- Photo of truck on Twitter page
Nicole gave an excellent interview. WUSA highlighted some of the comments on their Facebook page. Amanda Reyes wrote:
I don’t want my children seeing this.
But Claire Lauderdale Gardner said:
These pro-lifers are showing the truth of what abortion does. It is tough to explain to kids because it is the gruesome murder of an unborn baby. And most kids git that it’s killing a baby no matter what a parent’s views are.
Another story popped up on our KSI trucks in Iowa.
Frank Cagle has a great column in the Metro Pulse commemorating the 10-year anniversary of Tennessee’s most recent defeat of the state income tax. Cagle writes:
… someone ought to mark the occasion when almost the entire state political establishment, academia, and virtually all editorial writers were impatiently explaining to us Neanderthals that unless we passed a state income tax, the state was headed for financial collapse.
We were confidently told by University of Tennessee economists that the state tax structure could not support state government.
The income tax bill came to the House floor and was defeated.
Surely Armageddon would ensue.
Tennessee, 10 years on, has a current budget surplus of $600 million. The Legislature this past session eliminated the inheritance tax, the gift tax, and cut the rate of the sales tax on food. This year K-12 was fully funded and funds for higher education were increased. There will be an effort next year to eliminate the Hall income tax for those over 65, and possibly eliminate it altogether.
Name another state during this bad recession that has cut taxes. Around the country, state governments are in crisis. California cities are going bankrupt. Taxes are being raised to cover budget shortfalls.
When Tennessee state government was “starved for revenue” in 2002, the state budget was $20 billion. This coming year the budget is $31 billion.
In the comments appended to the WBIR story on our Urban GAP at Market Square, Canna asserted that nobody thinks abortion is a great thing:
OMG- NO ONE thinks abortion is a great thing- what an IDIOTIC thing to say. No one I know, including myself, is pro-abortion. However, I AM pro-choice. … The points that others are making here are:
1. that no one (few) are pro-abortion, they are PRO-CHOICE and believe the right to bear an embryo to full term is the choice and a matter of the family alone. not your matter.
2. that nearly everyone is a proponent of life and prosperity, but since we haven’t gotten it right yet, why don’t we help those in need of food and health before we force others to bear life. Rights to the unborn are valid but DO NOT PRE-EMPT the rights of the born.
3. regardless of ANYONE’S stance on abortion, your photos are unnecessarily graphic and DO NOT belong on public dislplay, especially in the presence of children. Not only is this rude, it is not an effective tool. ALSO- MOST abortions occur early trimester, when the fetus looks like a tiny lump of cells- not like in your graphics. Would you display graphic images of dead people in front of a DUI offender’s home for all-including children- to see? Of course NOT! Besides, where is the dignity of the deceased you post so proudly on public display??
Every time we visit a college campus, a steady stream of students and professors are eager to declare the wonderful benefits of legalized abortion for society. They are most definitely “pro-abortion.” They tell us that abortion helps create a society in which all children are “wanted.” Planned Parenthoods own motto is “Every child a wanted child.” They tell us that abortion helps eliminate child abuse. Who could be against that? They tell us that abortion helps alleviate overpopulation and poverty. Abortion even reduces crime, they say. They tell us that abortion helps create a more equitable society (as if women were somehow inferior to men and thus needed invasive medical procedures in order to be equal). I’m surprised you have never heard these arguments. Here an essay I found online just now: Why Abortion Improves Society.
You said, “Rights to the unborn are valid but DO NOT PRE-EMPT the rights of the born.” I believe the correct term for this logical fallacy is the “straw-man.” You have misrepresented the pro-life position when you suggest we believe that the rights of the pre-born preempt the rights of the born. The fact is that we believe the rights of the pre-born child should be equal to the born child. Not preeminent, but equal.
You said that most abortions occur “early trimester.” Not sure what you mean by that term. If you mean that most abortions occur in the first trimester, then you are correct. It’s about 90% of the total. And most of the abortion photos in our display are, in fact, first-trimester abortions. Only two of the abortion photos were not first-trimester abortions. For more on the developmental stages in the first trimester, visit http://www.EHD.org/.
When I was in high school, we were shown a graphic video of people who had been injured or killed in car accidents. The purpose was to show us the result of careless or impaired driving, and thereby motivate us to drive soberly and carefully. If showing such a photo in public could save just one teenager from being killed by a drunk driver, I would show it in a heartbeat. Of course, we don’t need to do that because our society does not cover up the results of drunk driving. But because all of society’s institutions cover up the results of abortion, you can count on us to expose that truth every chance we get.
I could also have pointed out that when Stephen Douglas debated Abraham Lincoln over slavery, he didn’t say he was pro-slavery. He merely argued that the Southern states should have the right to choose whether to be a slave state or a free state. In private, he stated that he opposed slavery. Would Canna say that Mr. Douglas was pro-slavery or just pro-choice?
Astonishing poem by Rudyard Kipling, published in 1919. How did he know about the Obamacrats? I guess it goes to show that our struggles against evil and idiocy are nothing new.
A copybook was used by English school children to practice penmanship. The heading on each page was some statement of common-sense wisdom, which the student would copy over and over again down the page. In Kipling’s poem, the Gods of the Copybook Headings were symbols for basic immutable truths. Examples like “Water would certainly wet us” and “Fire would certainly burn” convey the idea that some of these truths are so obvious, to dispute them would be insane.
In contrast are the Gods of the Market Place. This is not a reference to capitalism. The market is a reference to public spaces where people would gather to listen as demagogues tickled their ears with impossible and irrational promises. Their proclamations might have been absurd (e.g., that pigs have wings), yet people prefered the Gods of the Market Place because the promises, however unrealistic, were appealing.
In the modern day, the Market Place is MSNBC, CNN, etc, where Obamacrats promise that we can all get more and more free stuff (free college educations, free health care, more bureacrats to run our lives, etc.), and only a few people (the very rich) will pay for every bit of it. Such promises may sound good to teenagers and college professors, but mature, thinking people know it cannot work.
The Intellectual Activist summed it up nicely: “The point of the poem is that the various schemes for “social progress” being promoted at the time—and most of them are still with us today—are based on denying the basic truths represented by the Gods of the Copybook Headings.”
Here is Rudyard Kipling:
The Gods of the Copybook Headings
As I pass through my incarnations in every age and race,
I make my proper prostrations to the Gods of the Market Place.
Peering through reverent fingers I watch them flourish and fall,
And the Gods of the Copybook Headings, I notice, outlast them all.
We were living in trees when they met us. They showed us each in turn
That Water would certainly wet us, as Fire would certainly burn:
But we found them lacking in Uplift, Vision and Breadth of Mind,
So we left them to teach the Gorillas while we followed the March of Mankind.
The Gods of the Copybook Headings have been around for a long time, but we think we have “progressed” and have no further use for them.
We moved as the Spirit listed. They never altered their pace,
Being neither cloud nor wind-borne like the Gods of the Market Place,
But they always caught up with our progress, and presently word would come
That a tribe had been wiped off its icefield, or the lights had gone out in Rome.
While we chased after false teachings, the Gods of the Copybook Headings never changed, nor were they blown around like clouds. When civilizations abandoned the Gods of the Copybook Headings to chase after progressive absurdities, those civilizations died.
With the Hopes that our World is built on they were utterly out of touch,
They denied that the Moon was Stilton; they denied she was even Dutch;
They denied that Wishes were Horses; they denied that a Pig had Wings;
So we worshipped the Gods of the Market Who promised these beautiful things.
The Gods of the Copybook Headings were hopelessly “out of touch.” They denied that the absurdities advanced by the God of the Market Place were true (e.g., that the Moon was made of Stilton cheese, that pigs had wings, etc.), so we worshipped the Gods of the Market.
We prefer to worship Gods which make us feel good. I’m reminded of the many churches which won’t talk about sin and other unpleasant realities, because such old-fashioned talk will not appeal to the masses, who prefer a more “seeker-friendly” fare.
When the Cambrian measures were forming, They promised perpetual peace.
They swore, if we gave them our weapons, that the wars of the tribes would cease.
But when we disarmed They sold us and delivered us bound to our foe,
And the Gods of the Copybook Headings said: “Stick to the Devil you know.”
A 1919 reference to the modern-day effort to take away our arms, so that only criminals may have guns and law-abiding citizens may live in fear.
On the first Feminian Sandstones we were promised the Fuller Life
(Which started by loving our neighbour and ended by loving his wife)
Till our women had no more children and the men lost reason and faith,
And the Gods of the Copybook Headings said: “The Wages of Sin is Death.”
“Which started by loving our neighbour and ended by loving his wife”: Liberalism tells us we must love our neighbor, which they define as giving more and more of our money to the government so they can give it to their own pet voter groups. But liberalism sees nothing at all wrong with “loving his wive” (i.e., adultry).
“Till our women had no more children”: Less than three weeks ago, the USA Today reported that the birth rate in America is the lowest in 25 years. The birthrate among Europeans is so low, it amounts to cultural suicide. So ask yourself, “Is their something about socialism that causes people to lose confidence in the future and in themselves, to the point that they will quit having children?”
In the Carboniferous Epoch we were promised abundance for all,
By robbing selected Peter to pay for collective Paul;
But, though we had plenty of money, there was nothing our money could buy,
And the Gods of the Copybook Headings said: “If you don’t work you die.”
Obviously, Kipling foresaw the Obamacrats. The Intellectual Activist put it this way: “That’s a concise summary of the inevitable disaster of the welfare state. And more: it names a key part of the mentality behind it—the systematic evasion of basic, obvious truths. Who thought this was ever going to work? Who thought we could build a society in which an ever-increasing number of citizens are told that they don’t have to work and that their needs will be provided for by somebody else—while the burden is shoved onto the shoulders of an ever-smaller, ever-more-despised minority of producers?”
Then the Gods of the Market tumbled, and their smooth-tongued wizards withdrew
And the hearts of the meanest were humbled and began to believe it was true
That All is not Gold that Glitters, and Two and Two make Four
And the Gods of the Copybook Headings limped up to explain it once more.
As it will be in the future, it was at the birth of Man
There are only four things certain since Social Progress began.
That the Dog returns to his Vomit and the Sow returns to her Mire,
And the burnt Fool’s bandaged finger goes wabbling back to the Fire;
And that after this is accomplished, and the brave new world begins
When all men are paid for existing and no man must pay for his sins,
As surely as Water will wet us, as surely as Fire will burn,
The Gods of the Copybook Headings with terror and slaughter return!
The inevitability of what awaits us is daunting, to say the least. But we can’t give up because the consequences of failure are so great (e.g., terror and slaughter). Our children depend on us, and fighting this battle is just part of being good parents.
We face an alliance of theivery and stupidity on a scale that is breathtaking, but perhaps we can be encouraged with the knowledge that on this world, the struggles against evil and stupidity are timeless. Rudyard Kipling knew them, and now so do we. Ronald Reagan knewm them as well, when he reminded us that “Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction.”
I recently got a check from the Golden Rule Insurance Company. It was a “refund” mandated by the ObamaCare law, the purpose of which is to drive private health insurance companies out of business so that eventually we will be forced to buy from the Government monopoly.
I sent it back.
I had purchased the policy for only a few months, way back in 2011, when my wife was laid off from her job.
Here’s my letter:
Mr. Patrick F. Carr, President
Golden Rule Insurance Company
712 Eleventh Street
Lawrenceville, IL 62439
Dear Mr. Carr,
I received your check in the amount of $103.14, apparently extorted from you on my behalf by the US Government. I refuse to accept it; I am returning the check.
I contracted with you to provide insurance coverage. I went to the market place and selected the policy offered by Golden Rule because it offered the best combination of coverage and price, in accordance with my needs. I kept my end of the bargain, and you kept yours, and that’s all there is to it.
This so-called “refund” is nothing short of organized theft, conducted on a massive scale by a lawless band of thieves known as Obamacrats. The very idea that I would share in their malfeasance by accepting stolen money is repugnant to me.
I am happy that you were able to cover your costs and hopefully make a profit. As long as you keep your promises, I hope you make a huge profit. Please be assured that I have done (and will continue to do) everything I can to protect all of us from this ongoing attack on our freedoms. I hope you can say the same.
C. Fletcher Armstrong, PhD
P.S.: If you happen to see any Obamacrats in the course of your day, please tell them for me that I’d thank them to keep their damn noses out of my business and their grubby hands off my health care.
Update, October 18, 2012
They sent the check back to me and said if I didn’t cash it, they would have to put it in some kind of government-run unclaimed property system. So, I accepted the cash and gave every penny of it to the Save America Before It’s Too Late fund, also known as the Mitt Romney for President campaign.
With abortion pictures, we send a strong message to a culture that prefers to ignore or trivialize abortion. We also have a message for pro-lifers who think we are too confrontational: No social reform movement has ever succeeded by covering up injustice.
Social reformers win when they expose injustice and make people uncomfortable with the status quo. This is perhaps the overriding theme of Dr. Martin Luther King’s Letter From a Birmingham Jail.
Commenting on the WBIR story about our GAP on Market Square, Lissa wrote:
This is no way to win hearts, Dr Armstrong. If anything, you turn people away and they will never hear the message that all life is sacred. Please go watch 180MovieDotCom and learn a loving, Christ-filled way to truly get through to people’s hearts.
Ms. Hailey, our operating principle comes from the King family. Dr. Martin Luther King said, “America will not reject racism until America sees racism.” He was successful in bringing social change because he was able to bring about the broadcast/publication of video/photos that made people see what racism was all about. When they saw Black men and women being attacked with dogs and water cannons, they realized that segregation was way worse than they imagined. His niece, Dr. Alveda King, now says, in the same way, “America will never reject abortion until America sees abortion.”
Thomas Clarkson used a diagram of a slave ship to help end the slave trade in England. Clarkson’s biographer Adam Hochschild said that “Iconic images have power because they allow us to see what previously we could barely imagine.” American abolitionists use images to help people see the horror of slavery. Lewis Hine used photographs to show people what abusive child labor looked like.
In every one of these examples, social reformers were successful when they exposed injustice. Can you name one example in which reformers were successful by covering up injustice?
I would encourage you to read the statement by Alabama Clergymen (12 April 1963), which prompted Dr. Martin Luther King’s now-famous Letter From a Birmingham Jail. These well-intentioned clergymen said, in essence, that Dr. King was too confrontational, that his tactics did nothing to solve the problem of racism, and that he should just stay home. Then read his response. He explained why it was necessary to create in society a discomfort with the status quo. Without that discomfort, there is no pressure for change. He explains it much better than I can. If his letter leaves you unconvinced, then there is not much more I can say.
No, there isn’t anything more to say if you think that showing huge pictures of dismembered fetuses is changing anyone’s heart for the better. It’s not just “uncomfortable” … it’s shocking, it is revolting, it is offensive and turns people OFF and they are NOT hearing your message … AT ALL.
Further, you are handing the enemies of life ammunition to use against not only you but everyone else that advocates for life, especially that of the unborn. I state that I am pro-life and I am automatically assumed to be “one of those crazy people waving around pictures of fetal tissue” and one step away from bombing an abortion clinic. MY message of love is LOST because of YOUR offensive pictures.
Go look at what Ray Comfort is doing 180movie … HE is changing hearts, or rather, he is opening hearts to the love of Christ and from there Christ is changing hearts and minds. God is using Him to bring love, hope and a message of life to a world mired in sin in the name of pleasure and convenience … and it is working. What you are doing is not.
They are not hearing our message? Tell that to the nine babies whose lives were saved when their mothers saw the pictures over at UTK the first time. Tell that to Lisa and Suzanne at the end of this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b8Rk44gn824
Just now found this in my “Draft” folder. For the record, here is the media coverage from our Fall 2011 Genocide Awareness Project (GAP) excursions to Liberty University, Radford University, and the U of Tennessee at Chattanooga.
GAP at Liberty University
- Abortion demonstrators share graphic message with local college students
- Pro-life group gets banned from Liberty University
- Anti-Abortion Group Demonstrates near LU
- Thinking Christian: Christians condemning Christians
- Students react to graphic anti-abortion demonstration at Radford University
- Abortion protests manifest at Radford, Liberty
- Graphic abortion protest at Radford U
- Letter to Editor: Big images, big impact
- Feelings toward protest from Republican perspective
- Letter to the Editor: New student overwhelmed by club presentation
- Letter to the Editor: Demonstration opens eyes to opposite sex
University of Tennessee at Chattanooga
You are currently browsing the Fletcher's Blog blog archives for August, 2012.