by Maggie Egger
During GAP at Oakland University (OU) in March, a young man approached our display, then quickly became very emotional. He stepped back from the crowd and started yelling that women should have the choice to abort, because they could be in really terrible situations, and we can’t judge their particular circumstances.
Then it became personal. He said when his mom was in college, with a promising career ahead of her, she became pregnant by a man who was not much more than a casual hook-up. She dropped out of school and sacrificed her career to care for him, the unplanned pregnancy. He said she was miserable because of it. She married his father, but they went on to have an abusive and dysfunctional marriage and family. By this point, the young man was crying and his voice started to shake. He said that he wished that his mom had aborted him, because then maybe she would have had a chance at a better, happier life.
Then Mirna Awrow, co-president of OU Students for Life, stepped forward. She said, “I’m sorry that you had to go through that as a kid, and that your mom had to go through that. But I’m so glad she didn’t abort you. I am so glad that you’re here today. We value your life, no matter how it came to be. You are valuable and you are loved.” They continued talking quietly for a little while. He calmed down significantly, and before he left I heard Mirna say, “Can I give you a hug?” He accepted.
I observed several interesting things in this encounter. First, Mirna’s demeanor was so calm and loving, it completely diffused a very emotionally charged situation. Second, she didn’t try to debate abortion. That’s not what this young man needed to hear at that moment. Third, the reaction of the pro-abortion protesters was perhaps the most depressing and disturbing thing that I’ve seen on campus in a while.
The young man started off with the slogan of “personal choice” and of course the pro-abortion protesters cheered this. However, when he said he wished his mother had aborted him, most of them took their reasoning to its logical conclusion and continued to agree with him. In essence they were saying to him, “We wouldn’t care if you were dead.” That’s the mindset that we encounter in people who have, for decades, reduced the preborn to mere clumps of cells, instead of whole, distinct, living, valuable, human persons. And while that mindset is depressing, when it is juxtaposed with the pro-life view, the result can be encouraging. After all, if everyone always valued all life from fertilization to natural death, it would be no big deal for Mirna to tell that young man that she values his life, not only in that moment, but from the very first moment of his existence.
Maggie Egger is a CBR Project Director in Virginia and a regular FAB(ulous) contributor.
More than 70,000 pro-lifers attended one of the 352 Protest PP rallies held across the nation on Saturday. Yours truly had the honor of addressing the crowd of about 200-300 who attended the rally in Knoxville; a transcript of my remarks are given below.
Many thanks to rally organizers Pastor Cecil Clark of True Vine Baptist Church and Paul Simoneau and Lisa Morris of the Diocese of Knoxville. This was a truly unifying event for pro-lifers in Knoxville.
FWIW, here is what I had to say:
The Planned Parenthood videos are changing us
Thank you for coming out this morning.
And thank you, Center for Medical Progress! You caught Planned Parenthood selling baby parts! You caught ’em red-handed! You made their barbarity undeniable. You created video reports that are having a great impact all over this country. Thank you!
Like all of you here today, I’ve been watching these videos with great interest, and I can tell you that more are coming. But more important, I’ve been watching the response. Not just the response of the media and the public, but the way people in our own pro-life movement have reacted. A couple of observations, if I may.
First, I’m happy to say that we are more unified now than ever before. In the past, yes, we have disagreed on strategy. That’s OK; we will some more. But frankly, we haven’t supported each other like we should. We haven’t collaborated like we should. We haven’t shared resources. Sometimes, we work so hard fighting each other, there was little time to fight the enemy.
Perhaps these videos are galvanizing and unifying us, in the same way that the photos of Emmett Till galvanized and unified a generation of civil rights activists some 60 years ago.
Second, we are unifying behind the only strategy that can work — exposing the evil for all the world to see. For decades, we tried to win the argument without proving the facts. We kept our best evidence hidden. We hogtied ourselves. We failed to make people see that abortion decapitates and dismembers little human beings. We may have talked about it with our words, but we did not force people to see it with their eyes. We allowed abortion to hide behind it’s own horror.
But that’s all changing, now. All over the country, pro-lifers have unified behind the distribution of these videos. Earlier this week, Bobby Jindal, governor of Louisiana and a serious candidate for President, played the Planned Parenthood videos, several of which feature abortion victim images, on a huge outdoor screen at the governor’s mansion.
Think of that, a governor put abortion victim images on the lawn in front of the governor’s mansion, for all the world to see.
The times, they are a’changin.
Or are they?
My friend Kristan Hawkins at Students for Life of America wrote, “Game changed.”
But is she right? Has the game changed?
I hope so.
But frankly, it’s too early to tell. The answer to that question won’t be found in Washington or in the pro-abortion media. The answer will come from you … and what you do.
Because, you see, a whopping 70% of Americans have heard little or nothing about the videos. The story is being covered up by the media. They’ve distracted the low-information crowd with story after story about some dentist who shot a lion in Africa. They know that eventually, the videos will play out and, they hope, will be forgotten. And they are just waiting.
But it does no good to complain about them. We don’t control what they do; we only control what we do.
The game won’t change until we force-feed the ugly facts into the hearts and minds of that other 70% who haven’t seen it yet.
But that will take hard work. They don’t see our Facebook posts. They don’t click on our videos. Too many of them get their news from the Comedy Channel … or maybe MSNBC … which is just a dumbed down version of the Comedy Channel. They don’t come to us; we have to go to them. That will take a long-term commitment on our part.
What can you do? Commit to a regular program of giving your time, your treasure, or both. To paraphrase Mother Teresa, “Live differently, so that others might live.”
And this is cool: your phone can help you.
Would the Lord lead you to help moms in crisis? What this: “OK Google now; locate Hope Resource Center.” See, number comes up right on your phone.
Post abortion healing? “OK Google now; locate Deeper Still.” There’s the number. Or maybe “Rachel’s Vineyard.”
Prayer ministry? “40 Days for Life.”
Political campaigning? “Tennessee Right to Life.”
Reaching that 70% who won’t come to us? Reaching college students, high school students, and even apathetic Christians? “Center for Bio-Ethical Reform.” “OK Google now; locate Center for Bio-Ethical Reform.”
Trust me; many Christians are among that 70%. But with your help, we can exhort them to repent of complacency and apathy.
Use your phone. Call today.
Some of you might consider a vocational commitment. The other side has made killing babies a full-time profession, but we have made saving them a part-time hobby. Of course we value our faithful volunteers, and everyone here can’t be a full-time missionary, but I bet there are 1 or 2 or 3 who can. Or maybe you could be a part-time missionary. Perhaps your kids are mostly grown or you need a part-time retirement job. I pray you will think about it. And everyone here can pray for God to raise up the army that will end the killing. And everyone here can pray for a willing heart.
People like to say, “Let’s make our voices heard!” And that’s great, but that’s not enough. The game will change only when we make the weight of our commitment felt, here in Knoxville, all over Tennessee, and across this Land.
I know you’ll be up to the challenge.
It’s a source of conflict and it won’t go away. What do you think? Please comment.
More and more, pro-life activists are showing up at political events, Tea Party functions, Christian assemblies, and even pro-life rallies to display abortion victim photos (AVPs). We at CBR do it, and so do others.
Event organizers routinely take exception to this, asserting that we are being disrespectful, divisive, disruptive, etc. They ask us to put away our signs. “This isn’t the time or place,” they say.
We do it anyway. It is our duty to expose injustice. Yet, over and over again, it is never the disaster that rally organizers fear. Maybe it’s because we always respect the rights of organizers to reserve space for their own exclusive use, and we never disrupt or interfere with any of their activities. Here is how we do it:
- We communicate our intent to display AVPs near the subject event.
- We assure the organizers that we will keep our signs out of whatever space they have reserved for their own exclusive use.
- We promise that we will not go near the podium nor interfere with the event in any way.
- We make it clear that we are not there to protest their event, but to deliver our message to an important audience. We come as friends and co-laborers, albeit determined to fulfill our own particular mission.
- We even let the event organizers tell us where they want us to stand, within reason. When they see that we are reasonable, then they are reasonable (most of the time).
- We send a letter or e-mail to the police notifying them of our intent to display AVPs; we offer to meet with them to discuss locations, rules of conduct, etc.
Why do we show up at pro-life events? Because the abortion industry is chopping up little babies and selling them for parts, and somebody needs make that point clearly visible and undeniable.
Pro-lifers are an important audience for our message. We want them to see how serious abortion is. Almost every full-time pro-life activist can trace his activism back to that day he first saw an abortion photo.
We want to demonstrate how AVPs can be displayed in a respectful way.
Finally, we want to invite pro-lifers to become more active in the movement, perhaps as a vocation. That’s vocation, not vacation! The other side has made killing babies a full-time profession, but we have made saving them a part-time hobby.
Yes, pro-lifers are often our most important audience, but there are others. For example, we want news reporters to know that abortion decapitates and dismembers its victims. Whether they decide to report that fact is another thing, but at least they will know.
Passersby will wonder what the rally is all about. We want them to see that the rally isn’t about the abstract notion of “choice,” but instead is about the decapitation and dismemberment of little human beings.
So what happens? Nothing bad. In the end, we have never caused a problem for event organizers, despite their initial fear and trepidation at our presence. They did their thing, we did ours, and we all sang Kumbaya at sunset. Well, maybe everyone didn’t sing Kumbaya, but nobody has ever claimed that we disrupted their event.
May we respectfully offer the following Rules for Rallies for your consideration:
- People who organize rallies have every right to set their own agendas.
- People who organize rallies have every right to control the space they reserve for their own exclusive use. They get to decide what signs get brought into that space and what signs don’t.
- People who organize rallies don’t get to control everything within visible sight, however. Spaces that are still available for general use (i.e., still available for use by the general public while the event is being held) may not be claimed by the organizers as off-limits to AVPs.
- People who display AVPs have every right to do so on the public sidewalk and in public spaces that are not being used by rally organizers.
- People who display AVPs have every right to target whatever audience they choose, including people who are going to or leaving a rally, with whatever message they choose. Just as the pro-life movement (PLM) is fighting against the status quo of abortion in society, some in the PLM are challenging the status quo of the PLM itself.
- People who display AVPs have as much right to engage people walking toward a rally as pro-lifers have a right to engage people walking toward an abortion facility.
- Nobody has the right to veto the proclamation of truth.
- Displaying AVPs near a rally does not disrupt a rally.
- People who display AVPs should, as a courtesy, notify the rally organizers of the plan to respectfully display AVPs on a nearby public space in a way that does not interfere with the rally itself.
- Under most circumstances, it is not unreasonable for the rally organizers to ask for a 5-foot buffer between their crowd and the people holding AVPs.
As a matter of course, we always notify the police that we intent to display AVPs. In our letter or e-mail, we normally offer to meet with them to answer questions and discuss specifics. This gives the police managers a chance to tell the street officers that we do indeed have the right to be there.
That’s what FAB thinks, but you might change our minds. What do you think?
At Georgia Southern, Bert had been speaking with CBR’s Maggie Egger for a while when he asked, “What if the woman is an addict, and she’s going to have a baby that’s really handicapped?”
Maggie trotted out the ever-present, imaginary, 2-year-old toddler. This particular toddler was handicapped, to match the circumstance that Burt described.
Maggie asked, “Would it be OK to kill this toddler because of his handicap?” Bert, of course, said not.
Then he revealed the reason he asked, “My sister is an addict and she’s pregnant right now.”
But now reflecting on what he had seen and heard, he said thoughtfully, “I think having this baby might help her. I bet when people in her situation have abortions instead, it’s very easy for them just to go back to their old bad habits, and they’ll eventually kill themselves, slowly.”
Maggie talked about her experiences helping women in New York City, how some of them had huge obstacles to overcome. But many of them were much more motivated to work once they realized that other people (to be specific, their own children) were counting on them.
[This all reminded us of the student at Middle Tennessee State whose mom was waiting tables when she got pregnant with him. She didn’t abort (obviously, since the child was now grown up and speaking with us). He said, “After she had me, she got serious about her life and went back to school. She got her nursing degree and now she’s the head nurse at a hospital, making about 80 or 90 grand a year.” He thought a minute and then said, “You know, I think if my mother had aborted me, she would still be back there waiting tables.”]
Bert thanked Maggie and walked on. GAP may have saved his little niece or nephew. He or she wouldn’t be the first one. Here is another (link).
At Georgia Southern University (GSU), Okie told our Jackie Hawkins that his father had aided (forced?) the abortion of two older siblings, before raising three successful boys.
Okie looked both shocked and confused as he studied the pictures. He was ambivalent about the concept of abortion … or at least he tried to be. His blasé statements were interrupted with curses, betraying his shock at seeing abortion for the first time:
Well it should be legal. … Oh, s***!!!
I mean it’s just a choice. … What the f***!!!
The images were forcing their way into his conscience.
Okie is a black student, so Jackie told him about the abortion industry’s racist history. He continued to look at the pictures with a confused and horrified expression. He finally said, “You’re really making me think about this.”
Amen! That’s what we came for!
by Kendra Wright
At Tennessee Tech, a Middle Eastern student told me that he is Muslim and in his country, killing the unborn is just like killing a born person. But he knew very little about abortion.
He was very shocked to hear that 1.2 million die every year in this country from abortion.
He asked why people get abortions and if “not wanting” the child is a frequent justification. I confirmed that this is often the case.
I started explaining the difference between a wanted child and an unwanted child. If a child is wanted, we call it a baby. If it is unwanted, we call it a clump of cells.
He was shocked. “A clump of cells?!”
He could see right away that a baby is not just a clump of cells and calling it such is ridiculous.
Kendra Wright is a CBR project director and a regular FAB contributor.
by Kendra Wright
At UNC Wilmington, I asked a young man what he thought. He immediately said he was pro-choice, that people have good reasons for having abortions.
I pointed out that even if I had good reasons for killing him, that wouldn’t make it right or acceptable. He agreed.
We spoke a while. After a lull in the conversation I asked him if he was still pro-choice. He said yes and reverted to “people have good reasons” to abort.
I said, “Wait a minute, we already talked about this. Good reasons do not justify killing human beings.” Again, he agreed. Then he fell silent.
I asked again if he was still pro-choice, but this time, his mind was changing. “Hmm, I don’t know,” he said.
He went on to say that people are ignorant about the science of human development and that he appreciated our use of graphic images.
Once he understood the implications of his pro-choice view he realized he couldn’t firmly hold it. That is what pictures do: they neutralize the opposition, convert the neutral, activate the converted, and energize the active.
Kendra Wright is a CBR project director and a regular FAB contributor.
by Kendra Wright
Who needs to see abortion photos? Everyone? Even those that are already pro-life?
This point can seem confusing. If you already believe something, you don’t need to be convinced of it. Right?
Yet, it is clear that Christians are doing almost nothing to stop the killing in the culture. They are even killing their own children at staggering rates. One in five women who abort identifies herself as a born-again or evangelical Christian.
Secular universities devote massive resources to training advocates for the abortion industry, but Christian universities like Liberty University have zero training programs to prepare Christians students for the pro-life mission field. Zip, zero, nada.
In fact, Liberty has even forbidden pro-life students from displaying abortion victim photos on campus.
It is a tragedy every time a savable baby at Liberty is killed by abortion. But CBR is working to change all that.
Beth Fox is one Liberty student who is willing to stand up and be counted. On several occasions, Beth, (CBR Project Director) Maggie Egger, and I have stood in front of the Liberty library with a sign showing an abortion victim photo. The sign first asks if Jesus would use a bloody picture, then answers that question with a picture of the Crucifixion.
Many student studied this sign and discussed it with their friends as they walked by. Two students that gave us a thumbs up.
As we were packing up to leave, a professor came up and asked why we were there. He wasn’t against the use of the pictures, but he was confused about their use at Liberty. He asked, “But why are you here on a Christian campus? Isn’t everybody here already pro-life?”
Maggie stopped him with her reply, “Are they doing anything about it?”
Good question. The pictures challenge Christian complacency.
Kendra Wright is a CBR project director and a regular FAB contributor.
by Nicole W. Cooley
I got my first collegiate baseball cap at Liberty University in August 2011.
But at Liberty, we weren’t actually on the campus. Despite requests by Student Government and CBR, the Liberty Administration repeatedly denied permission for our GAP display. First Amendment rights don’t exist at private schools.
That is very creepy, I thought. But then I saw the fine print at the bottom of his sign.
But we came anyway. We used the streets, sidewalks, and public spaces just off campus. We displayed GAP signs at the campus entrances and drove Truth Trucks around the perimeter of campus. Five Truth Trucks. For an entire week.
I lost count how many times students asked me, “Why are you here? Everyone at Liberty is pro-life already. Why don’t you go somewhere else?” Many were annoyed at our presence.
Over and over I replied, “I’m so glad you are pro-life. What are you doing about it? Do you vote pro-life? Do you sidewalk counsel outside of abortion clinics? We’re here because you are attending the largest Christian university in the United States. If we can’t get Christians to care about abortion, we have no hope of ending it.”
One conversation stood out. On the fourth day, a young man came up to me in tears. “Why are you doing this? I can’t get those pictures out of my head!”
I gently replied to him in the same way as I did the others, “We had to break your heart about abortion – otherwise you’d continue in ignorant apathy like the rest of America.”
On the last day at Liberty, we finally got a protester … or so I thought. A student stood along the side of the road with his sign which read, “Looking at dead babies just makes me hungry.”
That is very creepy, I thought. But then I saw the fine print at the bottom of his sign, “…for change.” Because he saw the pictures, he was hungry for change.
Amen! So are we.
Nicole Cooley is a CBR project director and a FAB contributor. This is the second in a series of “hat blogs” about memorable conversations gleaned from her experiences with GAP.
by Philip Hamilton
The Center of Medical Progress conducted a three year investigation on Planned Parenthood, in which it was discovered that the biotech company Stem Express, LLC had been purchasing intact organs from children aborted by Planned Parenthood medical staff. In addition, stem cells from aborted fetuses have been purchased by this company.
In 2010, California resident Cate Dyer founded the company Stem Express, LLC. A screenshot of the company website, before it went into maintenance after the July 14, 2015 news reports exposing the ties between Planned Parenthood and Stem Express, LLC., shows the following organs for sale:
An additional screenshot of the website shows the retail value of the organs sold:
Fetal organs have been sold for thousands or tens of thousands of dollars, depending on the quantity of cells within the organ itself.
Clearly, the sale of aborted fetal tissue and organs is a measure that has been taken by Planned Parenthood in order to make the abortion industry more profitable. Inhumane actions taken by Planned Parenthood, such as the sale of the organs of unborn children, are yet another reason why all taxpayer subsidies for that organization must be removed.
On July 15, 2015, a protest, consisting of pro-life leader Patrick Mahoney and about 60 other individuals, at Speaker John Boehner’s office called for an investigation into Planned Parenthood. Hours after the protest occurred, Speaker Boehner announced he will press forward with an investigation on Planned Parenthood. I recommend you encourage individuals to follow my Facebook group for updates regarding this Congressional investigation.
For more information on Stem Express, LLC, visit the Breitbart article, “The Retail Value of Fetal Organs Harvested by Planned Parenthood.”
For more information on Speaker John Boehner’s announcement see the Business Insider article, “John Boehner calls for investigation into whether Planned Parenthood is selling organs.”
Philip Hamilton is a CBR project director and new FAB contributor.
by Lt. Gov. Ronald L. Ramsey
Independence Day is a day to cherish. While it is fun and relaxing to grill out and shoot fireworks, it is important to remember that July 4 is not just a date on a calendar. It is a day to remember how we gained our independence. It is a day to remember who we are.
Going about our daily lives in this great country we take for granted just how this nation came to be. America did not become America by sitting back and accepting the commands of those who thought they knew better. We did not become a nation by bowing to the whims of an elite. This nation was established because free men and women had no interest in listening to a King who no longer represented them.
So they fought. Against greater numbers — and even greater odds — and won their freedom.
On this day, I often try to remove any thought of current events and think only of the great history of this republic and the story of its founding.
The news of the past few weeks makes that very difficult. It seems that every time I turn a channel or click a link, I see our culture and cherished institutions maligned and marginalized.
In Tennessee, the future is bright. I am consistently amazed at the ability of Tennesseans to care about each other and look after one another. We remain the best state in the nation to live, work and raise a family.
The nation’s future, however, looks darker.
We will not be fighting with guns or live ammunition, but there is a fight ahead. It is a fight about fundamental values. It is a fight about who we are. Like the American colonists of the 1770s, we must not sit back and let those who think they know better determine how we shall live. We need to take back the country our founders fought for 239 years ago.
After emerging from the Constitutional Convention of 1787, Benjamin Franklin was asked by a citizen what kind of government this new nation had. He responded simply: “A republic, ma’am, if you can keep it.”
This day — more than any other — is a day to remember the tremendous gift we were given by our founders and reflect on what we can do to keep it.
God Bless the Great State of Tennessee and God Bless America.
Ron Ramsey is a frequent FAB contributor. In his spare time, he is Tennessee’s Lieutenant Governor and Speaker of the Senate.
“You all are a bunch of racists for comparing abortion to slavery!”
The accusation is almost comical. We hear it all the time from students who have no better argument for decapitating and dismembering little human beings.
But of course, we didn’t invent the comparison. Long before there was a CBR, Jesse Jackson compared abortion to racial injustice. He must have been a racist.
As it turns out, Republican presidential candidate and retired neurosurgeon Dr. Ben Carson has also equated abortion with slavery. He must be a racist, too!
by Nicole W. Cooley
At the Shenandoah Valley Soap Box Derby, a complete stranger asked, “Did you go to Tennessee?”
He seemed really excited about my orange Tennessee hat. I hated to disappoint him, but “No, my boss did.”
I continued, “I am a pro-life activist. We travel all over the country with our Genocide Awareness Project (GAP), and I always get a hat from each campus.”
Who knew a simple baseball cap could spark a conversation about abortion with a complete stranger?
… he carefully dismantled each [fallacy] in a patient way, not acting superior, but as if he were merely suggesting another way to look at it.
I’ve been a collector all my life. I collected Longaberger baskets for years. I still buy a new basket on occasion, but at over 200 baskets, I’m pretty satisfied there.
As a child, I collected rocks from the different places we lived. We were a military family that traveled all over the world, so I have lots of rocks, including some neat limestone from England and large round rocks from a beach in Scotland.
But of all my collections, my current one is the most meaningful to me. You see, every hat has a story.
At the University of Tennessee, I spoke at length with a student who used to be pro-life, but changed her mind in college. Veteran pro-life apologist Mick Hunt took the lead. I call him “the philosopher” because he’s great at talking with students who are wrestling with higher-level questions. Her struggles centered around “bodily autonomy” arguments like the “famous violinist” who could be saved by an unwilling kidney donor. We sat on the grassy knoll across from the display for over an hour.
Mick gently explained how a mother’s relationship to her own child is different from a person being forced to offer his kidney to a complete stranger. I took note of his probing questions to specifically identify the fallacies in her thinking. I also saw how he carefully dismantled each one in a patient way, not acting superior, but as if he were merely suggesting another way to look at it.
I’m not sure if that young lady is pro-life today or not. But, I do know she must have wrestled with the things we talked about for some time. Most people are not solidly pro-life without having first wrestled a bit.
For most people, being pro-life or pro-abortion is a continuum; few are truly 100% pro-life or pro-abortion. Most get hung up somewhere along the line because of those pesky “exceptions” to the rules. They struggle with the idea of telling a rape victim she should carry to term or with preventing abortion in the case of fetal abnormalities. That’s why GAP is such a great tool for college campuses. We help students wrestle with the hard questions. We challenge the status quo of their own opinions. We put pebbles in their shoes and force them to think.
After watching Mick Hunt at work, I vowed to be ready next time. I went home and studied the bodily autonomy arguments in depth. At the next GAP, I would be ready to plant a few pebbles of my own.
Nicole Cooley is a CBR project director and a new FAB contributor. This is the first in a series of “hat blogs” about memorable conversations gleaned from her experiences with GAP.
by Ruth Rawlins
Americans do almost everything on a much larger scale, so I wanted to see how the colonials defend unborn children!
I lead the CBR UK team in London, so I was thrilled to travel to the USofA (along with colleague Mark Williams) to take part in the Genocide Awareness Project (GAP) at Oakland U and Grand Valley State U.
Before stepping foot on campus, we attended the Pro Life Training Academy (PLTA). Although we had attended similar training before, the PLTA was extremely helpful. The new material and interactive role-playing really brought the subject matter to life. I learned new ways to answer the tough questions.
“She told me that she was still pro-choice, but wanted me to know that I had saved any of her future children, in that she would never have an abortion herself.”
The huge GAP display, the many CBR staff and volunteers, the pro-life students, the Truth Truck, and even the pro-abortion protesters created a real buzz on campus. Students told us it was “the talk” all around the campus, not only in the hallways but in the classrooms as well.
I was particularly impressed with the warm and friendly approach of the GAP volunteers as they engaged the pro-abortion protesters. I was pleasantly surprised by the openness of those they were engaging, enabling real conversations to flow, something that rarely happens in the UK with those who oppose us. I witnessed many individuals soften through the way they were treated with such love and grace, which obviously counteracted the false preconceptions that pro-lifers are hard, cold, and angry!
I had many conversations, including one with a hardened professor who saw the strength and logic in our arguments that abortion is genocide, but stubbornly refused to accept the truth. Thankfully, the students were much more intellectually honest. Many young men and women listened, asked questions, and saw the terrible injustice in abortion. Some of these also signed up to join the pro-life college group, to find out more, to get involved, and to make a difference.
The most significant conversation for me was with a young woman protesting against GAP. This polite young lady came over to see what we had to say, asking all the questions she had, possibly trying to catch me out. She also disclosed some personal situations from her past. I sensed that she, like so many, didn’t have great self-worth. If these students do not see their own lives as worth much, then what worth can they attribute to a so-called “bunch of cells” or a hidden being?
Pointing to the images, I answered her questions. I also posed the question that “shouldn’t all human beings have worth?” She agreed that they do. She thanked me for the discussion, we hugged, and she walked away. First thing the next morning, before the other pro-abortion protesters had come out, she walked over to speak to me. She told me that she was still pro-choice, but wanted me to know that I had saved any of her future children, in that she would never have an abortion herself.
She said she had gone home and looked at the leaflet and thought how it is true that everyone should have worth, no matter their size. I was so encouraged – especially to hear her say the word “worth”. But I pressed her further about her friend’s children, “Aren’t they worth something, too?” She agreed and said she would try to persuade them not to abort if they were in that situation.
She was deeply moved, although she did continue to the bitter end to stand in protest with her pro-choice friends with her new banner “pro-choice doesn’t mean pro-abortion”. I too was deeply moved at her humility to share that change of heart with me. And I believe that the good work God has started in her will continue until she can proudly stand in defense of all pre-born children.
The GAP project showed me the huge importance of reaching these young people at this critical college age, where they are typically open to debate, open to logic, soft-hearted, and not so set in their ways as older people can be. It is vital that we continue to support educating and mobilizing this next generation to bring this genocide of the pre-born children to an end in their life-time. And I am so encouraged that, with the continued growth of projects such as GAP, they will do just that.
Ruth Rawlins is on staff at the Centre for Bio-Ethical Reform UK and a first-time FAB contributor.
by Kendra Wright
Sometimes people say we would be more effective if we “just passed out brochures.” One student at East Carolina University (ECU) suggested we “take it down a notch.”
Martin Luther King and William Wilberforce were not afraid to be bold … and they didn’t conquer social injustice with informational brochures. Several at ECU realized the effectiveness of our strategy and the need for boldness.
At ECU, one man stopped and faced the truth. He exclaimed, “Wow, I had no idea this is what abortion was! They are so tiny … and that is a hand!” He would not have known if we had not showed him.
Another student claimed that the display was “”too much.“” CBR’s Jane Bullington explained the history behind using pictures and how we focus on changing minds. He said, “I see what you are doing and respect your right to do it. If this had just been a brochure handed out, you and I wouldn’t be talking.”
A gentleman who regularly walks the ECU campus and prays scripture over it was so glad we were there. He too had used abortion photos and had stood his ground when told to stop. Other Christians and pro-lifers had told him to tamp it down, and he said NO!
CBR also says NO! We will not stop giving the unborn a voice!
Kendra Wright is a CBR project director and a regular FAB contributor.